I had to do a bit of tweaking in its onboard menu system, but I managed to get its sRGB coverage up to 97.9% with my X-Rite i1 Display Pro calibrator, which is pretty impressive for a TN screen. Whisper it, but the quality of its panel is actually better than the G2460PF. I'd certainly pay the extra £75 for an adjustable stand and higher refresh rate, but the VQ6 has a secret weapon up its sleeve. In many ways, the VQ6 feels a little superfluous in the face of the PF. Is it worth considering over our current 24in champion in our best gaming monitor rankings, though? Essentially, it's a stripped down version of its PF sibling, and comes with a price to match, the lowest I've seen being £135 compared to the £210 now demanded by its superior stablemate at time of writing. The VQ6 also comes with a slightly different set of ports, offering VGA, HDMI and DisplayPort, but no USB hub or DVI-D, and has a fixed, tilt-only stand. Whereas the PF went all the way up to 144Hz, the VQ6 maxes out at 75Hz. The main difference comes down to refresh rate. To some extent, they are - both share an almost identical outward appearance with an understated red stripe down the lower bezel, and each has a 24in TN panel that supports AMD's adaptive frame-rate technology, FreeSync, which makes your games appear smoother if your graphics card happens to be struggling a bit. Given they share all but three of the same letters, you'd think the AOC G2460VQ6 would be pretty similar to the G2460PF I reviewed a couple of weeks ago.
0 kommentar(er)
